B) Current Events in Sudan
I. Summary and Personal Response
II. Summary and Personal Response
III. Compare and Contrast
IV. Acrostic Poem
due April 24/25
Article 1: Outrage in Sudan over British Teacher
click here to view article
a) summary
About 10,000 young Sudanese rallied through the streets of Khartoum in demand of the execution of a 45 year old British teacher, Gillian Gibbons. She was earlier found guilty of insulting Islam by naming a class teddy bear Mohammed, and was sentenced to 15 days in jail and deportation. The demonstrators, holding ceremonial swords gathered outside Khartoum’s ceremonial palace, later marching to Unity High School then to the British embassy. They chanted “Shame, shame on the U.K.” as they passed some British reporters who were later asked to leave. Apparently, Gibbon’s sentence did not satisfy some Islamic leaders. Abdul-Jalil al-Karuri, Islamic advisor the president, stated that he was not surprised by the reaction of the people given the crime committed. He himself expected more out of the sentence. By Sudanese law, Gibbons would have faced 40 lashes or a year in prison, but was saved by her diplomatic status.
b) personal response
I believe that the rallies and demonstrations are reasonable as this is a serious issue to the Muslims. Most fighting in the world today is caused by discriminating other people’s beliefs, and no one wants to be discriminated. It’s a natural reaction. But Gibbons though, could have been more rational in her decision to name the stuffed bear Mohammed. Living in a country where the majority of the population is Muslims, she must be more aware that her actions could affect the people around her. She might have overlooked the consequences of her actions when she took the decision, that the naming of the bear won’t be a serious issue. The Muslims however takes it as a disgrace to the religion. As a Muslim, I know that The Prophet Mohammed may not to be represented in any type of form. That is why you do not see pictures portraying Mohammed. The naming of the bear of course goes beyond religious restrictions. But in my opinion, the Sudanese sentence of 40 lashes is not a reasonable sentence as Gibbons is not a Muslim and might not be aware of the consequences. Instead, a year in prison is more logical.
c) questions
How has this issue affect Sudan-UK relations?
How has the view of the Sudanese Muslims change after this incident?
How has religious discrimination affect the life of the Muslims?
Article 2: U.N. approves Darfur peacekeeping force click here to view
a) summary
This article revolves around the approval of peacekeeping by the United Nations in Darfur of Sudan with the peacekeeping force leading the African Union and the refusal of the conclusion. The ambassador of Sudan, Omar Bashir, persistently refuses and opposes the idea of peacekeeping and the force leading the union. The ambassadors of the United Nations took the time to ‘persuade’ Omar into accepting the decision for the idea of peacekeeping in Sudan to take place. The question of whether taking action at its state is much too late or is not needed is raised. This article includes important details of the signing between the rebel group and the government of the Darfur Peace agreement and includes the perspectives of others upon the timing and the consent in comparison.
b) personal response
This article is a perfect and flawless piece of writing in my point of view especially since it includes certain details to the events in which are mentioned in the article such as the Darfur Peace agreement signing, the approval of the peacekeeping force. From my perspective, this article has a clear relationship to Sudan due to its topic revolving around of the resolution to the Darfur situation. Sudan, given a reputation for the genocide firstly, has been facing problems of the Darfur crisis whilst the article concerns of the United Nations resolving the situation and the problems left behind of the situation. The article’s topic on the United Nations and the resolution to peacekeeping and Darfur Peace agreement relates to the Darfur crisis in Sudan, one that can be resolved in the way that was mentioned in the article, through peacekeeping of the United Nations.
c) questions
Why do you think Omar Bashir refused and opposed the peacekeeping idea?
Why do you think it was simple for the United States State Department to gather the rebel group and the government of Sudan together for the signing of the Darfur Peace agreement?
Why do you think action has not been taken earlier on when the Darfur crisis began?
Article 3: New York Times: Scorched-Earth Strategy Returns to Darfur click here to read
The Economist: The worsening chaos of Darfur click here to read
a) venn-diagram

click to enlarge.
b) personal responses
My thoughts and visions are clouted when I envisage the sadness and violence that reigns in Sudan. This prolonged strife and conflict shackles this country’s development economically, humanely, and sociably. This is extreme outrage and it appears to be unacceptable. The government, the Janjaweed, and other Arab militias continue mass murder, perpetuating genocide. On the contrary, the rebels- SLA and JEM also continue to fight back. With war between two sides, the north and the south, the citizens of Sudan are the only victims. Dehumanization is the ultimate end to bringing a solution. Genocide is not the answer! It rages me that people are foolish enough to think in such matter. Constant warfare and killings have only resulted to about 300,000 citizens killed, thousands fleeing, and 2.5 millions displaced. It is such a tragedy. I am also taken aback by the downright immorality of the leaders. President Omar al-Bashir is not a good administrator of country and it seems to be blunt but, I perceive him to be an imbecile. Leaders are looked up to as staunch advocates of peace and service and having virtues like benevolence and compassion. But I could tell leaders in Sudan are only warlords drawn to war. In addition, I defy the Sudanese actions towards the UN and African Union aid workers and peacekeepers. With good intentions of aiding the suffering Darfurians, they come but they are instead killed and attacked. Apparently, this is unjustified treatment. If the genocide and war between the north and the south continue to dominate the country, grim future and morbid hope only awaits Sudan.
c) questions
What are the benefits of this genocide to the government? And at whose expenses do they do it?
Are there other means to solve the problem other than bombing, mass killing, raping, and destroying?
If the Janjaweed, Sudanese Army, Arab militias and the southern rebels like the SLA and JEM come to a point to compromise, what is the best way?
Why would this war exist between military groups when the citizens are rather suffering from it?
Does the suffering of people bring better outcome?
Article 4: BBC: China’s dilemma over Darfur click here to read
a) acrostic poem
Great number of arms for Sudan is supplied by China
Economic and military ties between Khartoum and Beijing are strong
Nothing can thwart the prolonged loss of human rights in the Darfur Genocide
Oil, money, and economy are of greater importance than the vital lives of many for China
China patronizes Sudan’s principals regarding people management or perhaps they are indifferent
International society appeals to China’s better judgment regarding trade with Sudan
Defeats and tarnishes the purpose of the Olympics- to bring peace throughout the world
Evil is condoned by China
One can envisage the numerous lives as much as 200,000 gone to waste
Lots of efforts are made to appease the international community and to abrogate the issue of Sudan
Yet athletes, international organizations, and countries will not withstand such atrocity
Mankind is sacrificed for massive exports but China argues it has no relation with Beijing Olympics
Protests and oppositions don’t seem to quell but China continues to show that it is concerned with Darfur
Intolerable rampant killings in Darfur continue
Cordial relationship in trading proliferates continuously and their economy grows
Stark reality of the existence of systematic dehumanization
b) personal responses
As an opportunist, China’s top priorities are to earn a profitable amount of money with oil trade with Sudan. Be it profitable or economy-boosting, “the end does not justify the means”. The nature of mankind strives to only gain for themselves, turning a blind eye and deaf ear to the plea and suffering of others. China exemplifies in this regard. It occurs to me that China is as wicked as Sudan due to its advocating mass murder and supplying Sudan with arms. Perhaps China is dispassionate and indifferent to care. Meanwhile, the international community can’t seem to subdue the ongoing genocide with constant criticism. China stands firm with its strong relationship with Sudan trading military supplies and money in exchange for a guzzling amount on oil. Then the Beijing Olympics is involved with the genocide in Darfur. Human right activists, Steven Spielberg, and Hollywood stars calls for boycotts to suppress the trading between China and Sudan but china defends its position that other nations should not involve Chinese affairs. It seems to me that China is being to greedy opting for friendly trading relations with Sudan and managing the Olympics as well. Furthermore, in my opinion to forestall more deaths, sanctions could be the means to end this slaughter. But this cannot be possible with China using its veto at the UN Security Council and its ongoing trade that is flourishing lucratively. The Beijing Olympics should definitely be boycotted until the trading between Sudan and China has fully come to a stop or nations should make a decision to stop the Olympics in Beijing.
c) questions
Is it ethical to associate the Darfur genocide with the Olympics in Beijing?
As the genocide’s main arm supplier, is China worthy of hosting the Olympics?
Is China taking into account the amount of deaths in Sudan?
Is there a big chance of China being taken away the job of holding the Olympics?